[Solved] MMHA6600 Walden University Ambulatory EHR Vendors Worksheet

The Assignment—Part 1: Compare and contrast the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) of three vendors offering an ambulatory Electronic Health Record to independent physician practices. Construct a table that summarizes your SWOT analysis with an accompanying reference page listing any external resources used in your analysis. Comparisons should include quantitative/evidence-based information as well as qualitative.

Note: The following table is an example of what to construct for Part 1.

Vendor: (Consider Functional, Technical, Operational, and Strategic for each element of the SWOT) A B C
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats

The Assignment—Part 2: Write a 2-page executive summary outlining the one or two IT vendors that you recommend engaging for further acquisition activities such as stakeholder demos and request for proposals. The executive summary should be addressed to the members of your fellow executive leadership team. Be sure to clearly outline the strategic, operational, technical (IT) requirements, and market reasons for your recommendation. If you are recommending one vendor, justify your strategy to handle the organizations’ anticipated loss in negotiating leverage.

Note: You should submit both parts as one document, with Part 1 being an appendix to your executive summary. Your Assignment should show effective application of triangulation of content and resources to show your conclusion and recommendations. See the Week 2 Assignment Rubric for additional requirements related to research and professional writing.

EXCELLENT – above expectations GOOD – met expectations FAIR – below expectations POOR – significantly below expectations or missing
SWOT Analysis

Points:

Points Range: 43 (35.83%) – 48 (40%)

The SWOT Analysis shows depth, breath, triangulation, and clarity in critical thinking in addressing the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of three vendors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 39 (32.5%) – 42 (35%)

The SWOT Analysis fully addresses the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of three vendors.
Triangulation was attempted but not fully addressed.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 35 (29.17%) – 38 (31.67%)

The SWOT Analysis lacks depth, breath, triangulation, and clarity in critical thinking in addressing the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of three vendors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (28.33%)

The SWOT Analysis does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of three vendors.

Feedback:

Executive Summary

Points:

Points Range: 43 (35.83%) – 48 (40%)

The executive summary shows depth, breath, triangulation, and clarity in critical thinking in recommending vendors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 39 (32.5%) – 42 (35%)

The executive summary fully addresses the recommendation of vendors.
Triangulation was attempted but not fully addressed.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 35 (29.17%) – 38 (31.67%)

The executive summary lacks depth, breath, triangulation, and clarity in critical thinking in recommending vendors.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (28.33%)

The executive summary does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses the recommendation of vendors.

Feedback:

Writing

Points:

Points Range: 22 (18.33%) – 24 (20%)

The Assignment uses professional tone appropriate to the audience, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style.
The work is supported by the Learning Resources and more than three additional scholarly sources.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 20 (16.67%) – 21 (17.5%)

The Assignment is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, and writing errors. The tone is mostly professional and appropriate to the audience.
The work is supported by the Learning Resources and at least three additional scholarly sources.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 18 (15%) – 19 (15.83%)

The Assignment is somewhat consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, and writing errors. The tone is somewhat professional, but may not be appropriate to the audience.
The work is supported by the Learning Resources and less than three additional scholarly sources.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (14.17%)

The Assignment is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quoting. The tone is not professional and not appropriate to the audience.
The work is not supported by the Learning Resources or additional scholarly sources.

Feedback:

SWOT Analysis

Levels of Achievement:


43
(35.83%) – 48
(40%)

The SWOT Analysis shows depth, breath, triangulation, and clarity in critical thinking in addressing the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of three vendors.

39 (32.5%) – 42 (35%)

The SWOT Analysis fully addresses the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of three vendors.
Triangulation was attempted but not fully addressed.

35 (29.17%) – 38 (31.67%)

The SWOT Analysis lacks depth, breath, triangulation, and clarity in critical thinking in addressing the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of three vendors.

0 (0%) – 34 (28.33%)

The SWOT Analysis does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of three vendors.

Feedback:

Executive Summary

Levels of Achievement:


43
(35.83%) – 48
(40%)

The executive summary shows depth, breath, triangulation, and clarity in critical thinking in recommending vendors.

39 (32.5%) – 42 (35%)

The executive summary fully addresses the recommendation of vendors.
Triangulation was attempted but not fully addressed.

35 (29.17%) – 38 (31.67%)

The executive summary lacks depth, breath, triangulation, and clarity in critical thinking in recommending vendors.

0 (0%) – 34 (28.33%)

The executive summary does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses the recommendation of vendors.

Feedback:

Writing

Levels of Achievement:


22
(18.33%) – 24
(20%)

The Assignment uses professional tone appropriate to the audience, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style.
The work is supported by the Learning Resources and more than three additional scholarly sources.

20 (16.67%) – 21 (17.5%)

The Assignment is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, and writing errors. The tone is mostly professional and appropriate to the audience.
The work is supported by the Learning Resources and at least three additional scholarly sources.

18 (15%) – 19 (15.83%)

The Assignment is somewhat consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, and writing errors. The tone is somewhat professional, but may not be appropriate to the audience.
The work is supported by the Learning Resources and less than three additional scholarly sources.

0 (0%) – 17 (14.17%)

The Assignment is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quoting. The tone is not professional and not appropriate to the audience.
The work is not supported by the Learning Resources or additional scholarly sources.

Feedback:

Total Points: 120

Did not find what you wanted? Get help from our experts.

Find a Perfect and Reliable Professional Essay Writer Helper to write your essay for a Reasonable Price.

best essay writing service

Need help with your Assignment?

Give us your paper requirements,and we’ll deliver the highest-quality essay at only $13 a page.

Some of the free features you will receive:

Find a perfect and reliable professional for your essay writing needs.

Essay Writing Services

If you are a student who is struggling to meet tight deadlines, we are here to help! Do you need to employ an essay writing service? Hire us if you want the best essays. We are a dedicated staff of professional, well-seasoned, and superb essay writer helpers.

Dissertation Writing Services

Did you know we provide the best dissertation writing service on the internet? We continue to receive favorable feedback from our consumers about the excellent work we produce. So, instead of worrying about whom to pay for the dissertation, contact us. We are a dedicated staff of professional, well-seasoned, and superb essay writer helpers.

Assignment Writing Services

We attempt to provide the essay help you require ensuring, that your papers are of the highest quality. When you decide to work with us, we assess your requirements and find the best writer to assist you with your essay. We are a dedicated staff of professional, well-seasoned, and superb essay writer helpers.

Nursing Essays Writing Services

Here’s how it works: you place an order for a nursing essay, and we deliver. It’s as easy as it sounds. This is workable because we have the greatest professional paper writers that are both quick and skilled. We will assign your assignment to the most qualified writer

Coursework Writing Help

Our staff of qualified and professional paper writers has continuously distinguished us as the best coursework writing help service. They are all-natural English speakers with advanced degrees in a variety of professions. We offer the best essay writing services.

Article Writing Services

Our knowledgeable and expert article writing paper writers have advanced degrees in a variety of subjects. We will assign the most appropriate one to you based on the field and topic of your article review. They are all fluent English speakers who fully grasp your requirements. We are a dedicated staff of professional, well-seasoned, and superb essay writer helpers

You May Also Like…

Violence in Sports Essay Sample

Violence in Sports Essay Sample

Violence in Sports Essay Sample From an outsider's perspective, it is hard to understand the social aspect of a sports...